The Reasons You should Spend More Money on Next Laptop

These days, you can purchase a passable laptop for little more than the cost of an iPad. As of February, the average Windows notebook cost just $513 and, for less than that, you can find a strong system that comes with modern specs like a Core i3 CPU, 4GB of RAM and a 500GB hard drive. But just because you can grab a low-rent laptop for $399 at Best Buy doesn't mean you should. Our friends at Laptop Magazine explain.

Whether you're buying a notebook that's made to order or choosing between different ready-made models, you need to pay a little extra to be happier and more productive. Here are five laptop features worth the splurge:

1. High-Resolution Screens

You can never be too rich, too thin or have too many pixels, but unfortunately most notebooks today come with lame 1366 x 768 screens that show even less of your favorite Web pages above the fold than their 1280 x 800 counterparts from 2007. When it comes to surfing the Web, editing documents, sending email or viewing photos, it's all about vertical real screen estate. Having 900 vertical pixels instead of 768 can allow you to see an additional paragraph or more of text without scrolling. When you're not scrolling all day, you can read more and get more work done.

If you're purchasing a MacBook, make sure to buy one with at least a 1440 x 900 resolution (MacBook Air 13-inch, MacBook Pro 15-inch or higher). If you're buying a PC notebook, spend the extra money to get a screen that's at least 1600 x 900. And if your notebook is 15.6-inches or larger, try going for a 1920 x 1080 resolution display.

On sites that provide configure-to-order notebooks, the cost delta between a 1366 x 768 screen and a 1600 x 900 screen is anywhere from $50 to $100. For example, HP.com charges $100 to upgrade the $579 Pavilion dm4t's screen to the higher resolution, while Dell charges $50 to up the $499 Latitude E5420′s screen to 1600 x 900 and $150 to move the XPS 15′s screen from 1366 to 1920 x 1080. The one caveat is that many of the systems that come with a higher-res screen option are marketed as business notebooks, but that's no reason a consumer couldn't buy and enjoy them.

Solid State Drives

Every second you sit there waiting for your computer to boot or Photoshop to load is bringing you a second closer to the end of your life. Why not use those seconds to do something more rewarding, like opening more applications?

The speed delta between using a traditional hard drive and an SSD is greater than the difference between riding a Big Wheels on a cobblestone road and racing down the Autobahn in a Porsche 911. In our tests, our favorite SSD, the Samsung 830 Series, took less than half the time of a 7,200-rpm hard drive to open a 500-page PDF in Adobe Reader X (3.8 vs 7.1 seconds), and less than a third of the time to open a Excel 2010 to a large spreadsheet (4.2 vs 14 seconds) and to launch Photoshop CS 5.1 with a 400MB TIF (8.4 vs 25.9 seconds).

What can you do with the extra 17.5 seconds you won't be waiting for Photoshop to open? How about opening 17 more browser windows (at less than 1 second each), reading five more tweets from your friends or observing 1.7 billion particle collisions?

Unfortunately, the price delta between buying a notebook with an SSD and a hard drive is significant, but anything around $200 for 128GB of storage should be considered good. For example, Lenovo charges a reasonable $180 premium to upgrade a ThinkPad Edge E420s to SSD while Dell charges $230 to bump the Latitude E6420 to SSD. In those cases where the premium is unreasonably high, look for preconfigured models with an SSD built-in like the $849 Toshiba Portege Z835. Bottom line: SSDs are worth the money because you're buying time.

Longer Battery Life

Unless you're buying an 8-pound notebook you plan to leave on your desk as if it were a desktop, you need as much endurance as you can get. Most low-cost notebooks don't come with enough to juice to last more than 3 or 4 hours on a charge, which is barely enough time to watch a single "Lord of the Rings" movie, let alone write a detailed report for work or school.

Whether you're hopping from conference room to conference room in the office, heading from one classroom to another or walking around the show floor at CES all day, you don't want to worry about finding an outlet. Even when you're just lying in bed using your notebook, it can be a real pain to be tethered to the wall or stop to charge every few hours.

Save yourself from laptop battery panic by choosing a notebook that gets a bare minimum of 6 hours on a charge, with 8 to 10 hours preferable. High-endurance notebooks like the ASUS U31 series cost a little more than the $500 average notebook price, but when you can get 9+ hours of battery life, spend the money.Long battery life review:aspire 4730z battery, AS09A61 battery.

If a notebook is available with different battery choices, such as Acer laptop battery,always go for the higher-capacity battery, even if it adds a little bit of weight or sticks out the back. For example, the Lenovo ThinkPad X220 lasts a strong 7 hours and 51 minutes on a charge with its standard 6-cell battery. However, when you pay an extra $30 to upgrade to the 9-cell unit, it lasts an incredible 12 hours and 39 minutes while only adding 0.2 pounds to the laptop's weight and 1 inch to its depth. If you don't mind another 1.5 pounds of weight and another 0.6-inches of thickness, an optional battery slice takes the battery life up to 20 hours and 18 minutes, enough time to fly from New York to Taipei with a 3-hour stopover in Tokyo.

More: 11 Ways to Increase your Windows Laptop's Battery Life
More Powerful Processors

When you invest in a new notebook, you want to hold onto it for a good three years, without feeling like it's too slow to run today's apps, let alone tomorrow's updates. The lowest-priced notebooks on the market use sluggish Intel Pentium or AMD Athlon chips, while many average-priced systems sport modest Intel Core i3 chips.

Spring for a system with an Intel Core i5 or Core i7 processor to give yourself enough oomph to crunch videos and spreadsheets today while future-proofing you against the next couple of years of innovation. Core i5/i7 CPUs can turbo boost up to a higher frequency while performing processor-intensive tasks, so your 2.5-GHz laptop can actually overclock itself up to 3.1-GHz while you're playing a game.

he cost delta between Core i3 and Core i5 is fairly minimal in most cases. The price difference between a Dell Inspiron 14R configuration with Core i5 and one without is just $70 on Dell.com. However, when you jump up from a bargain basement Intel Pentium CPU, you pay a larger premium. For example, HP.com charges $170 to upgrade its Pavilion G6t from Pentium to Core i5. Spend the money.
Discrete Graphics

While the integrated HD 3000 chip on Intel's 2nd Generation Core Series processors offers decent graphics performance for everyday tasks and video playback, many applications benefit from discrete graphics. Though we're able to run "World of Warcraft" at modest settings on integrated graphics, we don't even bother to test out serious titles like "Crysis" or "Batman: Arkham City" without a dedicated Nvidia GeForce or AMD Radeon chip on board, because those games won't be playable at even low settings.

When you have a discrete chip, you can also achieve significantly better performance in photo and video editing apps, as many are optimized to run filters, compress files and show previews more quickly by using the GPU. More importantly, the latest Web browsers have hardware-accelerated graphics capability that affects the playback of next-gen Internet applications. More and more sites are adding 3D elements and animations that run so much smoother with discrete graphics. Check out Microsoft's Beauty of the Web site to see some great examples.

The cost of upgrading from integrated to discrete graphics is usually in the $75to $150 range for vendors that sell configure-to-order or sell notebook configurations with this feature. For example, HP.com charges just $75 to upgrade from integrated Intel HD Graphics to an AMD Radeon HD 7470M GPU when you buy the Pavilion dv6t.

Hands on with Windows 8 CP: Battery life test

Tablets and Ultrabooks are on the rise and Windows-on-ARM (WOA) tablets are on the horizon. For Windows 8 to succeed in today's -- and tomorrow's -- market for both low- and high-powered portable devices, Microsoft needed to get rid of its "fat" Windows without losing functionality. The goal was to not just increase responsiveness, but also to improve battery life, which is obviously one of the core criteria for everyone shopping for a new laptop or tablet. How does Windows 8 fare? We've got answers".

Microsoft's promise: Less energy consumption

Redmond pushed out almost a dozen blog posts that either demonstrate their battery life/power consumption improvements or show off how new their new features (e.g. USB 3.0 support, Connected Standby, Live Tiles, Metro Apps) are built with saving power in mind.

Here are the highlights:

All background Metro-style apps will be suspended; only the foreground app consumes resources and thus battery life. If an app is not on screen and actively used, it shouldn't drain battery. Only a set of apps will be allowed to use background activity (e.g. for music playback or printing).

. Improved idle usage of the OS.
. On-system drivers, such as the USB host controllers and keyboard drivers, put the device into low-powered modes sooner.
. Memory deduplication mechanisms to reduce RAM workload.

Battery life benchmark: Windows 8 consumer preview

"We think of power as a critical system resource, just like CPU utilization, hard disk activity, or memory consumption." explains Pat Stemen, a Program Manager on the Windows Kernel team, on the B8 blog.

So how power-friendly is the new Windows exactly? We wanted to put Windows 8 CP up for a test run on a variety of laptops and see how it stacks up against Windows 7 SP1. Here's the hardware I used:

Laptop A -- Acer Aspire 7551G. A Run of the mill 17-inch laptop with a Phenom II X4 CPU and 4 GB of RAM. Good for multimedia, but not particularly well-suited in the battery life department.

Lapotp B -- Samsung NC 10. One of the better 2008-era netbooks. The usual yada-yada specs (Atom N270 1.6 GHz, 1 GB RAM). Low performance, extremely good battery life.

Laptop C -- 13" MacBook Air (2011) equipped with a 1.8 GHz Core i7, 4 GB of RAM and a 256 GB SSD drive.

I didn't test on an ultrabook, but the MacBook Air running Windows matches the most current ultrabooks in terms of specs, battery power and form factor.

All three represent very different laptops, targeted at very different audiences. Evaluating these devices should give a good glimpse of what to expect on the battery life front.

Test scenario

I used PCMark 7's "Lightweight" test, which simulates typical workloads such as adding music to Media Player, browsing the web, copying files and scanning for malware while leaving a couple of seconds of idle time in between. I looped the test until the battery of the device ran dry. Second, I just let the laptop sit there, do nothing and just "die". While that's not a particular realistic scenario, it demonstrates idle usage which is very important for battery life: Remember, you're not constantly pushing your CPU to its limit -- while you're reading something, sitting in a meeting or just waiting in between presentation slides, your laptop needs to go into idle as fast as possible and stay there until you do something. It is a good basis for judging power management.

Since third party software usually impacts battery life, I installed only the very basic programs such as Office 2010, TeamViewer, SnagIT, Adobe Reader and Flash on both machines. In all cases, I used the "Balanced" power saver mode and cranked up brightness to about 50-70%, while leaving Wi-Fi on.
Results

I repeated each test run exactly three times to avoid discrepancies. In each and every case I got pretty much same results (+/- 5 minutes). Results are measured in minutes:

Microsoft has done its homework. Idle performance of Windows 8 seems to best that of Windows 7 SP1 in every case. This is especially true on the MacBook Air: Here, idle battery life increased by 51 minutes. Even under the PCMark 7 workload, it managed to squeeze 24 minutes of additional battery life out of the machine. Our trusty old Samsung NC 10 ran for 40 more minutes in "idle" while it gave me another 20 minutes under typical workload. While that's not a lot, it may just mean the difference between wrapping up a movie or work on an airplane and having to stare at a blank screen for the rest of the flight.

Resource from:http://www.itworld.com/windows/254380/hands-windows-8-cp-battery-life-test?page=0,0

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Fews of laptop batteries review ,which have long battery life.such as GATEWAY AS09A51 battery, HP COMPAQ 360482-001 battery, FUJITSU FPCBP83 battery,ACER DR35 battery.